Do you have examples on reviewing Theories of Change?
Dear EvalForward Community,
As an evaluator, several times I got a task to perform a review of the Theory of Change / Intervention logic (or Logframe in the case of EU-funded projects). As I was browsing through the web in search of some interesting examples of how it was done in other evaluations, I did not find much in terms of guidance or best practice examples.
My approach to this task was to develop a set of guiding questions and focus on the ToC / Logframe content revision. I involved the main people dealing with the project implementation into a reflection process, as far as possible in a participatory manner.
I was wondering if you have some experiences to share in this respect.
- Do you know any good examples of guidelines to help in this task?
- Can you share some relevant reports or chapters which present findings of similar work? (if publicly permitted)
- What was the follow up of the ToC review: Were any significant changes implemented? Were there any barriers to introduce changes in the project?
I will be grateful for your insights.
Anna Maria Augustyn